Wishing this blog’s readers a merry Christmas.

L. Sissy M.

Holiday dream-3



Just to let you know that I haven’t been wasting this past four months – I’ve been reading, researching, writing and thinking hard about all things child-love and paedophilia. And I’ll be returning to normal service some time in February.

To tide you over the festive season here are some of my favourite songs (and girls & boys) from some older iterations of the divine Zecchino d’Oro. I find that the now-slightly-old-fashioned format, the fact that the singing is live, and that the children sing in their natural voices, makes their personalities emerge especially vividly.

I’ll start with a couple that have nothing to do with Christmas but which are especially close to my heart:






29 thoughts on “Merry Christmas from ConsentingA̶d̶u̶l̶t̶s̶Humans!

  1. Hello LSM,

    You promised to return to active blogging in February, didn’t you? Well, today is the 21st of the 2nd month, 2017 AD, so I suppose I have to wait not for too long before I can read your novel contribution! What will its topic be?


    Liked by 2 people

    1. hi Explorer,

      It’s nice to know that someone is awaiting the re-start of the blog with anticipation! You’re right – it’s fast approaching the moment when, if I fail to upload a blog, I’ll have failed to keep my promise to return end of Feb. I’m working on the inaugural blog for the 2017 season (almost) as I type. What will its topic be? I’m half way through and I still haven’t a clue what it’s about…

      Liked by 1 person

  2. >”Critical comments will be approved only if they address issues raised in the accompanying article or discussion.”

    Fair point irrational Muzphobe/BLOCKERphile Len (and TOC), but SeXmas-Nude Year Specials have no seXpicific topic. Sooo, why is good news by, er, ‘Good News’ still BLOCKED 4-skin daze ohn?
    GOOD NEWS says: JANUARY 6, 2017 AT 3:36 PM
    Your comment is awaiting moderation.

    Miskote Looziana KindPed ‘Killa’ Lee Lewis, “Whole Lotta BLOCKIN’ Goin’ Ohn !”………………

    Liked by 1 person

    1. deer irRational Muzphile/BlogHog Sexxie

      I’m not blocking Ewe, just that KNOT all of every-wunz comments get ape-Proved… despite that, let me ASS-ure eWe that I love ewE, and your CuntRibutions R always Whelk-Cum.

      Butt think of my comments seXShun ass Len’s private pre-teen/PrettyTeen beauty/booty PageAnt (Order – HYMENoptera) – many are CAWled (but George Best not CROW a bowowow tit) buTt Phew make it through to the swim-suit stage.

      As Tee-hee Lawrence once pooh TIT “the irrational tenth is like the kingfisher flashing across the pool”


      B̶L̶O̶C̶K̶E̶Rphile Len


      1. Dear (balletic) fair-points Len, parrrotfaze unelected alien Right-tard Monarch Mad Dog Murdoch, “Well dun my SUN! It matters not who is Brit P.M. UNDER me.”

        Then kwote True Brit broadcaster learned Lefty KindPed Peel, “Rupert Murdoch has destroyed most of what was good about this country.”

        Bonus kwotes:

        1) Native American Redskins (yesterday’s convenient ‘scapegoat Muzzys’), “We’ve been fighting terrorists since 1492.”

        2) Current Muz Lolis mid-East homeland VICTIMS asked what they would say to invading terrorist bombers mass killing MILLIONS of their siblings, families & friends since mid-East Oil was found c.100 yrs ago, “Go home – to America!!”


        1. Dear seCksie,

          Thansk for your Bonus kwicky kwala kwotes – let me ASSure U that there will be plenty of opportunities to debate the moslem problem in the cumming season of ConsentingA̶d̶u̶l̶t̶s̶Humans – but as your quote suggests – maybe westerners should get out of the countries moslems have conquered and ‘religiously cleansed’ – on the proviso that moslems reciprocate the favour – ‘go home – to Saudi Arabia’ – as a Yazidi (and therefore non-moslem) Loli being righteously and sacredly raped in one of ISISlam’s most holy and ISISlamically-approved sacrements might wish.

          “We went out with Allah’s Messenger (m̶a̶y̶ ̶p̶e̶a̶c̶e̶ ̶b̶e̶ ̶u̶p̶o̶n̶ ̶h̶i̶m̶) on the expedition to the Bi’l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing ‘azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid-conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah’s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah’s Messenger (m̶a̶y̶ ̶p̶e̶a̶c̶e̶ ̶b̶e̶ ̶u̶p̶o̶n̶ ̶h̶i̶m̶), and he said: It does not matter” (Sahih Muslim 3371)”


  3. Plum near fergot..

    AND in Christ’s FAKE $eXmas $eason (born in east Med Summer not Nth Euro winter).

    White BEARDY Saint Nick (not Satan Nick nor $atan $tate Nick-Nick U$ $teal$ yer dough – DOH!) but Santa Claus claws lil Lolis on his knee-jerk-Nick ooops Oh Gawd – CUM agin!!

    Kwote cheeky Chico Marx (not Commie Karl) to proven lawyer/liar, “U can’t fool me wi’ this fake contract! My Mama told me just last XMAS – there ain’t no such thing as a SANITY CLAUSE!!”

    Meanwhile that nice beardy Muz, A.K. (wiv annoyin’ lil Lolis crawlin’ all over his BIG bed while he’s tryin to wank) looks kinda like bad joke Brit, J.B. (starred as a repressed-Ped COP in ‘The Offence’) and beardy Beat-alls Brit Starr looks juss like nice beardy Muz, ‘Arry FAT? The lusty list could go on and on, anon…

    BIG Bonus Closeout Vid (fer now) real nice Soul boyz Rex Garvin & MIGHTY Cravers, “SOCK It To ‘Em J.B.!!”

    Kwote YT pro-Ped BOSS Bitch Tina, 1 yr ago (edited), ” R.G. & the MCs – WHOOOHHH ! “

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Utmost respect to LSM, from lil bro DSM.

    Lil Loli Lovin’ Learned Leonards’ depth and breadth of research, including into crumbling olde texts and much else, is matched only by the rare likes of ToC and too few more; here, there, and elsewhere.

    However, some concern about such a balanced mind. Capable of intense scholarly study and reasoned seXpression yet STILL ‘Tabloidically’ able to make shallow comments about ‘THEIR’ bearded unkind Imams aBusing Lolis.

    While the same fine mind somehow overlooks ‘OUR’ bearded KindPeds aMusing Lolis, e.g. Kilvert, Ruskin, Ovenden, et al. (DSM now ohn a fine razor’s edge tryin’ to name another NON-Muz beardy Ped kind or unkind.)

    Surely BEARDS are either irrelevant or aMusing to Lolis mostly keen on what’s behind the beard or between the legs, even keen on what’s between the ears of KindPeds like Learned Leonard.

    BEARDS??? Now Ur tawkin’ Doc Dawkins – ZeeZeeTOP!!! (Houston, BIG Tex, Motha Lovin Lowdown Cotton Panty Pickin’ Lil Boogie Band – only one NOT beardy? Frank BEARD! WTF?! “Gimme All Ur Lovin Lil Lolis”.


    1. True, beards are irrelevant – but I must say – I find it hard to imagine a four or five year old little girl finding Ayatollah K not-frightening, let alone ‘attractive’ – he is not generally known for his playfulness and sense of humour.

      And his beards (yes – he is so ‘beardy’ that I feel the plural is justified) contribute to his scariness.

      I’ve nothing against beards as such – face fungus has adorned my own iffy boat-race at various periods of my mortal coil – but when I think of a little girl with Ayatollah K bearing down on her with unasked-for tongue-kisses slobbering through those slabs of face-fibre, grizzled coconut matting – I find it hard to imagine her appreciating his attentions.


  5. So, Atheist Learned Leonard rightly DISBELIEVES modern well critiqued PROVEN wholly unbelievable Pedophobe UnHoly SUNspeak Tabloidic texts, including Right-tard Rupe’s BIG tart SUN in Drag – The Times.

    Yet naively STILL BLINDLY B-E-L-I-E-V-E-S Millenia Olde UNPROVEABLE Talmudic/Biblical/Koranic crumbling texts from pre-science, psuedo science, and unsound superstitious times?!

    Answer pleeze on piss poor parchment from Ye Olde Dead Sea BLOG Scrolls.


    Mentally well ordered Atheist DSM believes NOWT ’til it’s SCIENTIFICALLY PROVEN, and even then double-check, peer review, et al, ad nauseum – Yuk!! Or, we’re gonna run clean outta gas Houston!

    All rigged in HollyWeird ya’ll?!


  6. TRUE SeXmas CP ?


    But not by NON-Anglo 53.22% MAJORITY Nawty 99 of 186 nations.

    Where even IMMACULATE CONCEPTION TRUE-CP is A0K! Holy PEDO God impregnates Holy ADULTO Mary!!

    “All early Christian sources say Mary was 12 years old when she married Joseph the carpenter.”


    1. Thanks DSM

      Interesting that you should bring up that post from the discoverthetruefacts blog, since I stumbled upon it the other day.

      I give it no credibility, as it displays all the clear-thinking, reason and honesty that one would expect of an islamist.

      I read the post you link to and felt it so disingenuous and flawed. I consider Morehamhead’s treatment of little Aisha as much ‘paedophilia’ as a loving and considerate husband would consider the rape of women ‘heterosexuality’ – and it disgusts me more than I can express that islamists are not only keen to justify ham-head’s deeds, but also advocate the same treatment for little girls nowadays.

      Daesh, that shop-front for islam, has implemented child-marriage in the territories they occupy – the rape of kufr children is advocated as a means of gaining ‘converts’ – for a ‘warrior’ to marry a moslem little girl all is required is the father’s consent and the paying of a ‘dowry’. The girl need not consent. Intercourse can take place on the child’s ninth birthday – and islam does not recognise marital rape, even when exacted against a nine-year-old girl.

      As to ‘kufr’ little girls – well it’s non-holds barred as far as they are concerned.

      Anyway – not surprisingly the admin at discoverthe’truefacts’ has not seen fit to approve my comment – so I’ll reproduce it here.

      “Aisha was six when she was sold by her father to mohammed and sometime between the age of six and nine he started non-penetrative sex on her (‘thighing’ – a method in which he would rub his penis between her thighs – and he used a rag to cover the child’s genitals- presumably so she would get no pleasure out of the activity).

      She was nine when mohammed first, ahem, ‘penetrated’ her. If you question these numbers (as some moslems have recently started to try to do) then you doubt bukhari – and must therefore also equally doubt the Pillars of Islam, which bukhari repeat).

      You claim Mary was twelve when she married Joseph – twice the age of Aisha when mohumed first imposed himself on her sexually.

      Mary gave birth to Jesus therefore she must have already passed puberty, and twelve is a reasonably averagel age for a girl to pass puberty.

      Nine isn’t.

      Especially in an unhealthy, backwards society such as they would have been living in – puberty would probably be much delayed by ignorance, brutality, malnutrition and poor hygiene and superstition (viz the kuran’s failure to anywhere condemn bestiality and the mixed messages in the ahadith regarding bestiality – “Narrated Abdullah ibn Abbas: There is no prescribed punishment for one who has sexual intercourse with an animal.” Abu Dawud 38:4450 ).

      Is there any evidence that Aisha had passed puberty when mohammed first…’penetrated’ …her? Other than wishful thinking – ‘muhamud would never break his own rules’?


      Also mohammud constantly broke his own rules. Then he would tell his followers – ‘oh, alah said it was ok’ – or words to that effect.

      Compare the number of wives he permitted others (four) and the number he permitted himself (19 in all, and at one moment probably had eleven at the same time – and god knows how many if you include as ‘wives’ the sex slaves he permitted himself to ‘enjoy’).

      This and many other verses and incidents show that mohamed didn’t feel any compunction in breaking the rules he enforced on others with an iron fist.

      And why not rape Aisha?

      Sharia law stipulates that it requires 4 male eyewitnesses willing to support a girl’s testimony before that testimony is accepted in court. Not surprising marital rape is either not recognised as an offense or almost ‘zero’ in islamic countries.

      So really, once married, mohamad could do anything, short of actual violence, to obtain sexual satisfaction against little Aisha. His obsession with sex and his general brutality (“He struck me on the chest which caused me pain” – Aisha) suggests that he probably was willing to use coercion against her.

      Do you rate the Apocrypha as authoritative as Bukhari?

      Is there any evidence that Aisha at any point in her first nine years consented to anything that happened to her?

      Or do you take the line that “Silence is Consent”? How would that stand in a court of law in a *civilised* legal system?”


      1. Eloquently seXpressed, as ever, Loli-lovin Loquacious Learned Leonard.

        But what FAITH is there now in ANY Millenia Olde texts – Talmudic, Biblical, OR Koranic, et al?

        Even less reliable than today’s ongoing HOLY unbelieveable TABLOIDIC texts – Pedophobe SUNspeak, et al?

        So, how reliable is the linked-line, ““All early Christian sources say Mary was 12 years old when she married Joseph the carpenter.” Could easily be rephrased in anti-Muz, LSMspeak, “Innocent young child Mary was just 12 when against her will, she was forcibly betrothed to VILE Olde Pedo Joe, 80!”

        And, Koranic texts could be believably rephrased, “Bright Adultophile Aisha, 6, was so fond of friendly Pedo Mo (magnet to many sex-keen kids), that she happily wed him knowing he was kind and LURVED fine inter-femoral SeX. Tho she longed for full-pen, WAY before he kindly waited ’til she was a 9 y.o. Olde Maid.”



        1. “But what FAITH is there now in ANY Millenia Olde texts – Talmudic, Biblical, OR Koranic, et al?”

          Well, moslems are making a good hash at taking the koran literally – even ‘moderate’ moslems are obliged to think that every word of the koran is sacred and true, and that every deed, thought and act of mohammed was perfect.

          ” Koranic texts could be believably rephrased, “Bright Adultophile Aisha, 6, was so fond of friendly Pedo Mo (magnet to many sex-keen kids), that she happily wed him knowing he was kind and LURVED fine inter-femoral SeX. Tho she longed for full-pen, WAY before he kindly waited ’til she was a 9 y.o. Olde Maid.”

          No – Aisha was not even aware that she’d been married off by her parents. She sensed a change but wasn’t sure why. Then she found out she’d been married and then found out it was to Mohammad.

          That does not suggest that there was a strong connection between them.

          In fact, even at the age of six she was already engaged to another man – Mohammad ‘annulled’ that engagement.

          The islamic model for child-adult sex is worse than western paedophobia – at least children are protected from rape and non-consensual sex in the west – under islam little girls, once they’ve had their clitorises excised and their labia infibulated, will be little more than sex-slaves to their ‘husbands’, stored in black cloth bags and kept behind closed doors.


          1. “under islam little girls, once they’ve had their clitorises excised and their labia infibulated”
            There is no excision of girls in Islam, neither in the Koran nor in the Hadith, it is a tribal practice in some parts of Africa and in some other areas. It is reejected by all Islamic scholars, even the Wahhabis don’t practice it.
            Otherwise, do you think that Bukhari’s Hadith, written from oral traditions two centuries after the fact, is an exact historical record?
            And what makes you think that Mohamed raped Aisha, that sex between them was not consensual? Tradition often describes Mohamed as a seductive womaniser, not as using violence with women, and it also describes the marriage of Mohamed and Aisha as highly erotic (in the Muslim world, ‘Aisha’ is in some way the equivalent of ‘Lolita’).
            And why do you consider ISIS/Daesh as true representatives of pure Islam? That they claim to be so is no proof, otherwise the Nazis would be the true heirs of the ways of old German tribes, or Himmler would be a true Wiccan, or Brezhnev was a true Marxist, and G.W. Bush a true follower of Jesus Christ, etc.


            1. I will respond to your comment in several posts, Christian.

              >“There is no excision of girls in Islam, neither in the Koran nor in the Hadith, it is a tribal practice in some parts of Africa and in some other areas.”

              Excision and infibulation were common practices in 7th century Saudi Arabia. All the women mohammed would have penetrated would have undergone some kind of genital mutilation. He would have known about this practice – the fact that he nowhere criticised or condemned it is taken a proof that he approved of it.

              Verses from islamic sacred books used by moslems to justify FGM:

              “A woman used to perform circumcision in Medina. The Prophet said to her: Do not cut severely as that is better for a woman and more desirable for a husband.”
              — Sunan Abu Dawood, 41:5251 – here he encounters it and not only fails

              “Abu Musa reported: There cropped up a difference of opinion between a group of Muhajirs (Emigrants) and a group of Ansar (Helpers) (and the point of dispute was) that the Ansar said: The bath (because of sexual intercourse) becomes obligatory only-when the semen spurts out or ejaculates. But the Muhajirs said: When a man has sexual intercourse (with the woman), a bath becomes obligatory (no matter whether or not there is seminal emission or ejaculation). Abu Musa said: Well, I satisfy you on this (issue). He (Abu Musa, the narrator) said: I got up (and went) to ‘A’isha and sought her permission and it was granted, and I said to her: O Mother, or Mother of the Faithful, I want to ask you about a matter on which I feel shy. She said: Don’t feel shy of asking me about a thing which you can ask your mother, who gave you birth, for I am too your mother. Upon this I said: What makes a bath obligatory for a person? She replied: You have come across one well informed! The Messenger of Allah said: When anyone sits amidst four parts (of the woman) and the circumcised parts touch each other a bath becomes obligatory.
              — Sahih Muslim, 3:684

              “Yahya related to me from Malik from Yahya ibn Said from Said ibn al-Musayyab that Abu Musa al-Ashari came to A’isha, the wife of the Prophet,m̶a̶y̶ ̶A̶l̶l̶a̶h̶ ̶b̶l̶e̶s̶s̶ ̶h̶i̶m̶ ̶a̶n̶d̶ ̶g̶r̶a̶n̶t̶ ̶h̶i̶m̶ ̶p̶e̶a̶c̶e̶, and said to her, “The disagreement of the companions in a matter which I hate to bring before you has distressed me.” She said, “What is that? You did not ask your mother about it, so ask me.” He said, “A man penetrates his wife, but becomes listless and does not ejaculate. She said, “When the circumcised part passes the circumcised part ghusl is obligatory Abu Musa added, “I shall never ask anyone about this after you.””
              — Al-Muwatta, 2 19.75

              “I heard the Prophet saying. “Five practices are characteristics of the Fitra: circumcision, shaving the pubic hair, cutting the moustaches short, clipping the nails, and depilating the hair of the armpits.”
              — Sahih al-Bukhari, 7:72:779

              (90% of moslems follow one of the four Sunni schools)

              There are dichotomous differences of opinion among Sunni scholars in regards to female genital cutting.These differences of opinion range from obligatory to acceptable. The Shafi’i and Hanbali schools of Islamic jurisprudence consider circumcision to be obligatory for both males and females, while the Hanafi and Maliki schools of Islamic jurisprudence consider circumcision to be Sunnah (preferred) for both males and females.

              Historical religious views

              The historical religious view regarding the partial cutting of the clitoris, also known as Type One FGM, varies with the school of Islamic jurisprudence fiqh

              The Shafi’i school considers female circumcision to be wajib (obligatory).
              The Hanbali school considers female circumcision to be makrumah (honorable) and strongly encouraged, to obligatory.
              The Maliki school considers female circumcision to be sunnah (optional) and preferred.
              The Hanafi school considers female circumcision to be sunnah (preferred).

              As for the Shias –

              Shiite religious texts, such as the hadith transmitted by Imam Al-Sadiq, states, “circumcision is makrumah for women”. ‘Makrumah’ is usually translated as “meritorious action or noble deed, but something that is not religiously obligatory”.

              FGM, known as khatna, is considered a religious obligation in the Dawoodi Bohra community, in most cases performed on girls around age 7.


            2. >”Otherwise, do you think that Bukhari’s Hadith, written from oral traditions two centuries after the fact, is an exact historical record?”

              What I believe is not the problem, Christian. It’s the beliefs of moslems weilding rusty razors near little girls’ genitals that matter.


            3. >“And what makes you think that Mohamed raped Aisha, that sex between them was not consensual? Tradition often describes Mohamed as a seductive womaniser, not as using violence with women, and it also describes the marriage of Mohamed and Aisha as highly erotic (in the Muslim world, ‘Aisha’ is in some way the equivalent of ‘Lolita’).

              Because Aisha’s consent was not sought for the marriage. And at no point is it recorded as having been sought afterwards or given (‘silence is consent’ – we know how well that works!)

              Also mohammed decreed what we would call ‘marital rape’ effectively legal, or rather non-existent, when he declared

              Quran (2:282) – Establishes that a woman’s testimony is worth only half that of a man’s in court (there is no “he said/she said” gridlock in Islam).

              Quran (24:4) – “And those who accuse free women then do not bring four witnesses (to adultery), flog them…” Strictly speaking, this verse addresses adultery (revealed at the very time that Muhammad’s favorite wife was being accused of adultery on the basis of only three witnesses coincidentally enough). However it is a part of the theological underpinning of the Sharia rule on rape, since if there are not four male witnesses, the rape “did not occur”.

              Quran (2:223) – “Your wives are as a tilth unto you; so approach your tilth when or how ye will…” There is no such thing as rape in marriage, as a man is permitted unrestricted sexual access to his wives.

              mohammed – as would befit a warlord – brutalised his ‘wives’ including Aisha:

              Muslim Book 4, Number 2127: “(This is a long hadith where Aisha describes how she covered her head, put on her veil, etc and follows Mohammad outside at night to a graveyard and hurries back before him …)
              “..He said: Was it the darkness (of your shadow) that I saw in front of me? I said: Yes. He struck me on the chest which caused me pain, and then said: Did you think that Allah and His Apostle would deal unjustly with you?”

              Also mohammed was a habitual rapist – he preached it as a duty to rape kufr women – he also took captured women as sex slaves:

              “The Apostle of Allah (m̶a̶y̶ ̶p̶e̶a̶c̶e̶ ̶b̶e̶ ̶u̶p̶o̶n̶ ̶h̶i̶m̶) sent a military expedition to Awtas on the occasion of the battle of Hunain. They met their enemy and fought with them. They defeated them and took them captives. Some of the Companions of the Apostle of Allah (m̶a̶y̶ ̶p̶e̶a̶c̶e̶ ̶b̶e̶ ̶u̶p̶o̶n̶ ̶h̶i̶m̶) were reluctant to have intercourse with the female captives in the presence of their husbands who were unbelievers. So Allah, the Exalted, sent down the Qur’anic verse: (Sura 4:24) “And all married women (are forbidden) unto you save those (captives) whom your right hands possess.” (Abu Dawud 2150, also Muslim 3433)

              He also fails to condemn the rape of slaves captured in battle- provided they ejaculated within the bodies of their victims:

              “”O Allah’s Apostle! We get female captives as our share of booty, and we are interested in their prices, what is your opinion about coitus interruptus?” The Prophet said, “Do you really do that? It is better for you not to do it. No soul that which Allah has destined to exist, but will surely come into existence.” (Bukhari 34:432)

              “I drove them along until I brought them to Abu Bakr who bestowed that girl upon me as a prize. So we arrived in Medina. I had not yet disrobed her when the Messenger of Allah ( ) met me in the street and said: “Give me that girl.” (Sahih Muslim 4345)

              In the Massacre of Banu Quraiza, Muhammad order the beheading of 600 to 900 adult men (determined by pubic-hair growth) and he himself chopped off a few heads. He enslaved all the women and children of the Jewish tribe. The women were kept as sex-slaves with Muhammad himself taking a beautiful Jewish woman as his own sex-slave and sold the rest of the captives into slavery.

              >”in the Muslim world, ‘Aisha’ is in some way the equivalent of ‘Lolita’”

              What does that prove – other than they find the rape of a little girl amusing?


              1. You view medieval marriage through contemporary lenses: that a girl would accept a husband only if he was of her own choice, guided by romantic love feelings. In fact, marriage was then a purely practical affair, arranged by the families, and generally the young spouses just accepted the choice of their parents.
                As a student I knew an Indian man, he once told me he would marry and that his bride had been chosen by his parents. I asked him why he could not choose his wife himself, and he answered that arranged marriages are those that work best. Indeed, his marriage lasted. Robert Epstein studied marriage in India, and found that traditional arranged marriages last longer than Western-style romantic ones, because the spouses enter marriage without romantic illusions, viewing it as a partnership to be constructed day after day.
                You also view childhood through contemporary lenses, as being helpless and incapacitated. In the Middle Ages you were a child until about 7, and afterwards you were a youth in training. Many “children” according to modern standards were able to sustain themselves.
                As for excision and infibulation, I suggest that you talk with real-life Muslims and ask them whether their mothers, sisters and daughters have been excised or infibulated. I never heard of that being done among real-life Muslims I talked to.


                1. This would be fine and acceptable, Christian, if this all stayed in the past where it belongs.

                  But there are many moslem countries where these barbaric child marriage laws are in practice, where rape laws are inexistent, or unworkable or simply not supported in practice, and where women (and by extension – little girls) are treated as polluting chattels, where there are no laws protecting children from unwanted sexual attentions and sexual servitude (at least Western laws aim to do that!). And Countries where FGM is not illegal and is culturally encouraged.

                  There are also strong movements both in islamic countries, but also in civilsed countries, that want to restore the Caliphate and impose Sharia tyranny worldwide and impose islamic barbarity on civilised countries.

                  The reason why dark ages practices have remained in the dark ages in civilised countries – is that they were wrong – they produce neither prosperity nor well-being. Arranged marriages might work, but they destroy the liberty of the women involved. Child marriages might ‘work’ on some levels in certain situations – but it has to be a really shitty society for it to be the best option for a little girl – the girl ends up a domestic slave, uneducated, and little more than a perpetual reproductive machine – her infibulated vulva being opened up for the purposes of insemination (without pleasure since her clitoris has been removed) and for childbirth, and afterwards resealed, as a mark of her chattel-hood.

                  >“As for excision and infibulation, I suggest that you talk with real-life Muslims and ask them whether their mothers, sisters and daughters have been excised or infibulated. I never heard of that being done among real-life Muslims I talked to.”

                  That depends on where you live – if you live in New York or Madrid, yes, you might never meet a real life moslem woman whose been ‘cut’ (well the chances are that she either isolated from social intercourse by circulating covered in a black bag, or she’s just kept indoors by her owner).

                  But according to UNICEF data – if you lived in Egypt (91% of females subject to FGM), Somalia (98% of females subject to FGM), Mali (89% of females subject to FGM), Sudan (88% of females subject to FGM) and Guinea (96% of females subject to FGM) – it is very likely you’d get a different response to your questions (again, provided that the women were let out, or allowed to talk to you).

                  And interestingly, in Africa, those countries that are non-moslem, but where FGM exists – the percentages of women who have suffered FGM seem to track the percentage of the population that is moslem.

                  Both the symbolism and the function of FGM is perfectly congruent to the ethos of Islam – the hatred of women, the treament of women and girls as possessions of their family and husbands, the hatred of female sexual pleasure, the limiting of the function and role of women to reproduction and serving her owner. That is why it thrives amongst moslems and has almost completely died out amongst all the other religions – islam is the only religion that embraces depravity, hate and cruelty as a core of its tenets.

                  Yyou should stop apologising for the most barbarous and depraved ideology that has made it into the 20th and 21st centuries, Christian.


            4. >“And why do you consider ISIS/Daesh as true representatives of pure Islam? That they claim to be so is no proof, otherwise the Nazis would be the true heirs of the ways of old German tribes, or Himmler would be a true Wiccan, or Brezhnev was a true Marxist, and G.W. Bush a true follower of Jesus Christ, etc.”

              Of all the major extant religions – islam is the only religion that explicitly demands in its sacred texts that those sacred texts be taken literally:

              “So do you believe in part of the Scripture and disbelieve in part? Then what is the recompense for those who do that among you except disgrace in worldly life; and on the Day of Resurrection they will be sent back to the severest of punishment. And Allah is not unaware of what you do.”Quran [2:85]

              If you read the koran you will find that DAESH are following it strictly and literally.

              If you’ve got the guts to read their magazine ‘Dabiq’ (there are photos of islam’s most sacred act – jihad – being enacted) you’ll find that pretty much everything they write is done from a perspective of the closest possible interpretation of the koran and the ahadith.

              My own reading of sections of the koran confirms this.

              I could quote you the justifications to be found in the koran and ahadith for throwing homosexuals off buildings, stoning adulterers, amputating limbs of thieves, executing apostates and atheists or any member of a religion ‘not of the book’ that refuses to convert, for dhimmitude, for the immolation of those who have fought against islam, for child-marriage, for the rape and enslavement of captured kufr women , for taqiyya, kitman and other forms of lying, for jihad, for suicide bombing etc

              Daesh/ISIS is the essence of islam – more civilised versions of islam have become half-civilised through dilution with secularism and enlightenment values and consumer values.

              DAESH do nothing that mohammad didn’t do or advocate. And ask any moslem whether mohammad’s example shouldn’t be copied IN EVERY ASPECT, DEED and THOUGHT – you will find precious few who will say that it shouldn’t.


      2. @LSM

        Your defense of the modern notation that sex is rape, leaves no room for choice – neither the choice to have sex nor that of having long-term relationships. A loving husband, having sex with his willing young wife – the law in civilized nations calls that rape!

        Off-topic to this discussion -where are the blogs of Dissent and zlurker?


  7. This is great news to hear that you are going to continue blogging.
    It is especially important since there are very few pro-choice bloggers while anti-choicers continue to spread their message.
    By this I also want to encourage other pro-choicers like Dissident and zlurker to continue blogging as well.


    1. Thanks Galileo – love your work on astronomy and heliocentrism!

      I agree with you regarding the pro-choice blogs – we need more of them (I think every pro-choice paedophile who can write well should start a blog!).

      I’m actually really longing to start blogging again – I’m missing it badly, and long to return to the discipline and constraints I had started to find irksome before my break. I think this is a good thing – I feel that this holding-back is going to repay in energy and commitment, once I start back.

      I’m very excited about the ideas I’ve exploring during my break – some quite heavy stuff, but I think important, and I think I may have found a huge flaw in Cantor’s research – but I’ve got a lot more work and research to do on that one before I can be sure.


  8. REJOICE ! The unholy Pedo problem’s solved.

    Pro social gentle Jew sweet Jeez, was the HOLY Child of TWO Holy PEDO Dads and a Holy ADULTOPHILE Mom.

    “All early Christian sources say Mary was 12 years old when she married Joseph the carpenter.”

    So, the Unholy Pedo problem’s finally SOLVED. Legal & Moral, Global Ages of Consent currently 12 thru 21 – to be equalized down to TWELVE fer Wedlock and ZERO fer sex-keen kids self-consent and mere masturbation scientifically PROVEN starts unborn in the Womb!

    PLUS, Christians, Looziana ‘Killa’ Lee Lewis & Sweet Memphis Myra were sooo right WAY back in Rockin ’58!

    RealMeanwhile, inline/hereunder our KindPedPal/Pie SeXentric’s Festive lil lusty (current?) list o’ PRO-PedAdulto/CP cuntries STILL unCONtaminated by callous Right-tard AngloVIRAL CONservative inhuman so called ‘Laws’ since:

    1978, populist Right-tard Tory Townsend’s Private (parts) Member’s, ‘Protection Of Children Act’. KidseX craZed while CONveniently ignoring a VAST 96% NON-SeX serious child aBuses with MILLIONS of NON-SeX child aBuse VICTIMS. About whom kidSeX craZed callous AngloVILES don’t give a fuck!

    1988, populist Right-tard Tory turd Hurds’ ‘Criminal Justice Act’ grotesquely increased so called ‘Victims’ BIG compo payments, while making mere possession of CP a UK crime. CONveniently creating a typical populist Right-tard Tory double-whammy, of “FREELOADERS & WITCH HUNTERS CHARTERS”

    1994 & 1997, populist Right-tard Tory coward Howard’s ‘Criminal Justice & Public Order Act’ and discriminaTory ‘SeX Offender Register’ (1st ever in UK peacetime). CONveniently creating NO CORROBORATION/NO EVIDENCE so called ‘Complaints’ many hysterically historic into another typical right-tard Tory double-whammy, “LIARS & WITCH HUNTERS CHARTERS”.

    Of 186 listed cuntries (59 have ALL Porn BANNED) but here R SeXentric’s aMused MAJORITY 53.22% NAWTY 99-change hands ‘CP-possession Carry On Wanking’. Who don’t give a fuck about ineffectual intellectual snobheads, pinhead dancin’ pedheads, or kidseX craZed child aBusing callous AngloVILE so called ‘Laws’.

    Albania, Angola, Antigua, Argentina, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Belarus, Belize, Benin, Bhutan, Bolivia, Brunei, Burkina Faso, Burma, Burundi, Cambodia, Cameroon, Cape Verde, Cent African Rep, Chad, Chile, Colombia, Comoros, Congo Rep, Congo Dem Rep, Côte d’Ivoire, Djibouti, Dominica, Ecuador, Equatorial Guinea, Fiji, Gabon, Gambia, Georgia, Ghana, Grenada, Guatemala, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Guyana, Jamaica, Japan, Kazakhstan, Korea North, Korea South, Kyrgyzstan, Laos, Latvia, Lebanon, Lesotho, Liberia, Macedonia, Malawi, Maldives, Mali, Marshall Islands, Mauritania,
    Mauritius, Mexico, Monaco, Mongolia, Montenegro, Mozambique, Namibia, Nauru,
    Nepal, Netherlands Antilles, Nicaragua, Niger, Philippines, Qatar, Russia, Rwanda, Saint Kitts, Saint Lucia, St Vincent, San Marino, Sao Tome & Principe, Senegal, Serbia, Seychelles, Suriname, Swaziland, Tajikistan, Tanzania, Timor-Leste, Togo, Trinidad & Tobago, Tunisia, Turkmenistan, Uganda, Ukraine, Uruguay, Uzbekistan, Venezuela, Zambia, Zimbabwe.


........................... PLEASE LEAVE A COMMENT........................... comments from the outraged will be approved only if they are polite and address issues raised in the accompanying article or discussion. The 'email' field can be left blank.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s